The correct answer is: D. Neither I nor II is strong.
Argument I is not strong because it does not address the question of whether India should have a military force. It simply states that other countries do not believe in non-violence. This does not mean that India should not have a military force.
Argument II is not strong because it does not address the question of whether India should have a military force. It simply states that many Indians believe in non-violence. This does not mean that India should not have a military force.
In order to determine whether India should have a military force, we need to consider a number of factors, including the threat posed by other countries, the cost of maintaining a military force, and the potential benefits of having a military force. These factors are not addressed in either argument.