The correct answer is: D. Neither I nor II is strong
Argument I is not strong because it assumes that legal means are the only way to solve the problem of elderly care. In fact, there are many other ways to address this issue, such as providing financial assistance to elderly parents or creating more affordable housing options for them.
Argument II is also not strong because it assumes that only poor parents need help with elderly care. In fact, many middle-class and even wealthy parents may need assistance as they age, due to health problems or other factors.
Therefore, neither argument is strong enough to support the conclusion that children should be legally made responsible to take care of their parents during their old age.
Here is a more detailed explanation of each argument:
Argument I: “Yes. Such matter can only be solved by legal means.”
This argument assumes that legal means are the only way to solve the problem of elderly care. However, there are many other ways to address this issue, such as providing financial assistance to elderly parents or creating more affordable housing options for them. Legal means may be one way to address the problem, but they are not the only way.
Argument II: “Yes. Only this will bring some relief to poor parents.”
This argument assumes that only poor parents need help with elderly care. However, many middle-class and even wealthy parents may need assistance as they age, due to health problems or other factors. Therefore, this argument is also not strong enough to support the conclusion that children should be legally made responsible to take care of their parents during their old age.