The correct answer is: Only argument II is strong.
Argument I is not strong because it is based on the assumption that the government’s income is the only source of funding for developmental activities. However, there are other sources of funding, such as taxes, loans, and grants. Additionally, the government could choose to reduce spending on other areas in order to offset the loss of revenue from import duties.
Argument II is strong because it is based on the assumption that local manufacturers will not be able to compete with foreign manufacturers who are technologically far superior. This is a valid concern, as foreign manufacturers often have access to more resources and technology than local manufacturers. As a result, they may be able to produce goods at a lower cost and/or with higher quality.
However, it is important to note that there are other factors that can affect the competitiveness of local manufacturers, such as the cost of labor and the availability of skilled workers. Additionally, the government may be able to provide support to local manufacturers, such as through subsidies or tax breaks. As a result, it is possible that local manufacturers could compete with foreign manufacturers even if they are not technologically superior.