Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should the Government restrict all political and religious processions without prior permission of the government ? Arguments : I. Yes, such processions lead to riots many times. II. No, this is against the human rights in a democratic country.

[amp_mcq option1=”Only argument I is strong.” option2=”Only Argument II is strong.” option3=”Either I or II is strong.” option4=”Neither I nor II is strong. E. Both I and II are strong.” correct=”option2″]

The correct answer is: Only Argument I is strong.

Argument I is strong because it is based on evidence. There is evidence that political and religious processions can lead to riots. For example, in 2019, there were riots in Delhi after a Hindu procession passed through a Muslim area. The riots killed more than 50 people and injured more than 200.

Argument II is weak because it is based on an appeal to emotion. The argument states that restricting political and religious processions is against human rights. However, the argument does not provide any evidence to support this claim.

In conclusion, only Argument I is strong. Argument II is weak.