Consider the following statements:
- An additional spending by the Government of ₹ X is likely to have less impact on income than an additional transfer of ₹ X to households.
- An additional spending by the Government of ₹ X is likely to have less impact on income if it is not accompanied by an expansion in money supply.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Statement 2 is correct. Government spending can be financed in various ways, including taxation, borrowing from the public, or by increasing the money supply (e.g., central bank purchasing government debt). If the government spending is financed by borrowing from the public without an increase in money supply, it can lead to increased demand for loanable funds, potentially raising interest rates. Higher interest rates can ‘crowd out’ private investment, thus reducing the overall positive impact of government spending on income. If the spending is accompanied by an expansion in money supply, it can mitigate or avoid this crowding out effect, potentially leading to a larger overall impact on income. Therefore, spending not accompanied by monetary expansion is likely to have a *less* impact than otherwise.
– Government spending can lead to crowding out if not accommodated by monetary policy.