Consider the following statements: 1. The President of India can su

Consider the following statements:

  • 1. The President of India can summon a joint sitting of the Parliament.
  • 2. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides over a joint sitting of the Parliament.
  • 3. The Vice-President of India presides over a joint sitting of the Parliament if the Speaker is absent.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

1 and 2 only
1 and 3 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CAPF – 2010
Statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is incorrect.
– Statement 1: Article 108 of the Constitution provides for the President to summon a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament in certain cases of disagreement over a bill. This statement is correct.
– Statement 2: As per Article 118(4) of the Constitution, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides over a joint sitting of the two Houses. This statement is correct.
– Statement 3: If the Speaker is absent from a joint sitting, the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides. If both the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker are absent, the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha presides. The Vice-President of India, who is the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, does *not* preside over a joint sitting. This statement is incorrect.
Joint sittings are rare and are typically summoned to resolve deadlocks on ordinary bills. They are not applicable to Money Bills or Constitution Amendment Bills. The rules of procedure for a joint sitting are made by the President after consultation with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.