The correct answer is: Tribal displacement and restricted access.
British forest policies often led to tribal displacement and restricted access to forests. This was because the British government saw forests as a source of revenue and timber, and they wanted to control access to them. They also believed that tribal people were not using forests in a sustainable way, and they wanted to regulate their use. This led to the displacement of many tribal people from their traditional lands, and it also restricted their access to the resources that they needed to survive.
The other options are incorrect. Conservation and sustainable use of forests is a goal that is often pursued by governments and environmental organizations. However, this was not the goal of British forest policies. Rapid deforestation is a problem that has been caused by a number of factors, including British forest policies. Expansion of tribal rights over forests is something that has been advocated by some groups, but it was not the goal of British forest policies.
In conclusion, British forest policies often led to tribal displacement and restricted access to forests. This was because the British government saw forests as a source of revenue and timber, and they wanted to control access to them. They also believed that tribal people were not using forests in a sustainable way, and they wanted to regulate their use. This led to the displacement of many tribal people from their traditional lands, and it also restricted their access to the resources that they needed to survive.