The correct answer is: C. Both (A) and (R) are right.
Weber’s bureaucracy and Taylor’s scientific management both emphasize on rationality, predictability, impersonality, technical competence and authoritarianism.
Weber’s bureaucracy is a form of organization that is characterized by a hierarchy of positions, a division of labor, and a set of rules and procedures. It is designed to be efficient and effective, and to ensure that decisions are made in a rational and objective manner.
Taylor’s scientific management is a system of management that is based on the principles of efficiency and productivity. It is designed to improve the way that work is done by breaking down tasks into their component parts, and then studying and improving each part.
Both Weber’s bureaucracy and Taylor’s scientific management emphasize on rationality, predictability, impersonality, technical competence and authoritarianism.
Rationality: Both Weber’s bureaucracy and Taylor’s scientific management are based on the principle of rationality. This means that they are designed to be efficient and effective, and to ensure that decisions are made in a rational and objective manner.
Predictability: Both Weber’s bureaucracy and Taylor’s scientific management are designed to be predictable. This means that they are designed to operate in a consistent and orderly manner, and that employees know what is expected of them.
Impersonality: Both Weber’s bureaucracy and Taylor’s scientific management are designed to be impersonal. This means that they are designed to operate in a fair and impartial manner, and that employees are not treated differently based on their personal relationships with managers.
Technical competence: Both Weber’s bureaucracy and Taylor’s scientific management emphasize on technical competence. This means that they are designed to be staffed by employees who have the necessary skills and knowledge to do their jobs effectively.
Authoritarianism: Both Weber’s bureaucracy and Taylor’s scientific management are designed to be authoritarian. This means that they are designed to be controlled by a small number of people at the top of the organization, and that employees are expected to obey orders without question.
Though Weber’s writings were less operational than Taylor’s, yet ‘ideal bureaucracy’ describes many contemporary organisations.
Weber’s writings on bureaucracy were more theoretical than Taylor’s writings on scientific management. Weber was interested in the ideal form of bureaucracy, while Taylor was interested in the practical application of scientific management. However, both Weber’s bureaucracy and Taylor’s scientific management have had a significant impact on the way that organizations are structured and managed.
Many contemporary organizations can be described as ‘ideal bureaucracies’. They have a hierarchy of positions, a division of labor, and a set of rules and procedures. They are designed to be efficient and effective, and to ensure that decisions are made in a rational and objective manner.