The correct answer is: C. of
Anomalous finites are a group of finite verbs that do not follow the regular rules of English grammar. They are often used in informal speech and writing, and they can be difficult to understand for non-native speakers.
Some examples of anomalous finites include:
- I had ought to go. This is a common way of saying “I should go.”
- I might could do it. This is a way of saying “I might be able to do it.”
- I will have gone by the time you get here. This is a way of saying “I will be gone by the time you get here.”
Anomalous finites can be confusing because they do not follow the regular rules of English grammar. For example, in the sentence “I had ought to go,” the verb “had” is used in the past tense, even though it is not describing an action that happened in the past.
Anomalous finites are often used in informal speech and writing. They can also be found in some formal writing, but they are usually avoided in academic writing.
If you are not sure how to use an anomalous finite, it is best to avoid using it. You can usually find a more regular way of expressing the same idea.
Here is a brief explanation of each option:
- A. for is not the correct answer because anomalous finites are not a group of finites that are used for something.
- B. to is not the correct answer because anomalous finites are not a group of finites that are used to do something.
- C. of is the correct answer because anomalous finites are a group of finites that are a part of something.
- D. on is not the correct answer because anomalous finites are not a group of finites that are located on something.