Consider the following statements: 1. The 44th Amendment to the Con

Consider the following statements:

  • 1. The 44th Amendment to the Constitution of India introduced an Article placing the election of the Prime Minister beyond judicial review.
  • 2. The Supreme Court of India struck down the 99th Amendment to the Constitution of India as being violative of the independence of judiciary.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
This question was previously asked in
UPSC IAS – 2019
Statement 2 is correct, while statement 1 is incorrect.
– Statement 1 is incorrect. The 39th Amendment Act, 1975, inserted Article 329A into the Constitution, which placed the election of the Prime Minister and the Speaker beyond judicial review. However, this article was struck down by the Supreme Court in the case of Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narain (1975). The 44th Amendment did not introduce such a provision; rather, it repealed Article 329A.
– Statement 2 is correct. The 99th Amendment Act, 2014, sought to replace the Collegium system for the appointment of Supreme Court and High Court judges with the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC). The Supreme Court, in the Fourth Judges Case (Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association vs Union of India, 2015), struck down the 99th Amendment and the NJAC Act, 2014, declaring them unconstitutional and violative of the independence of the judiciary, which is considered a basic structure of the Constitution.
The 44th Amendment Act, 1978, primarily focused on reversing some of the changes made by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 (Mini-Constitution) during the Emergency period, including restoring certain fundamental rights and limiting the power to declare national emergency. The independence of the judiciary is a cornerstone of the Indian Constitution and the Supreme Court has played a vital role in upholding it.