Which one of the following is NOT a correct feature of a Money Bill ?

Which one of the following is NOT a correct feature of a Money Bill ?

It can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha
A Deputy Speaker can also certify a Money Bill in case of office of Speaker falling vacant
A Speaker's authority is final as to whether a bill is Money Bill or not
It can be referred to a joint committee of the two Houses
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CAPF – 2020
Statement D is incorrect. A Money Bill cannot be referred to a joint committee of the two Houses of Parliament. The Constitution provides a special procedure for Money Bills, where the Lok Sabha has overriding powers and the Rajya Sabha has limited scope for amendment (it can only suggest amendments, which the Lok Sabha is free to accept or reject). There is no provision for a joint sitting or joint committee for Money Bills.
Money Bills are defined in Article 110 of the Constitution. They can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha (Article 110(1)). The Speaker of the Lok Sabha certifies whether a bill is a Money Bill, and this decision is final (Article 110(3)). If the office of the Speaker is vacant, the Deputy Speaker performs this duty (Article 95(1)). The Rajya Sabha must return a Money Bill within 14 days with or without recommendations; if not returned, it is deemed to have been passed by both Houses.
A joint sitting of Parliament (under Article 108) is convened by the President to resolve deadlocks between the two Houses on ordinary bills, but this mechanism is not applicable to Money Bills or Constitution Amendment Bills. The limited role of the Rajya Sabha in passing Money Bills reflects the principle that the House of the People (Lok Sabha), which is directly elected by the voters, has primary control over financial matters.