The legacy of the zamindari system is debated, with some seeing it as:

Oppressive and exploitative
A pillar of traditional society
Complex, with both positive and negative aspects
Irrelevant to modern Assam

The correct answer is: c) Complex, with both positive and negative aspects.

The zamindari system was a system of land tenure in India that was introduced by the British East India Company in the 18th century. Under this system, zamindars, or landlords, were granted control over large tracts of land in exchange for collecting taxes from the peasants who lived on that land.

The zamindari system had both positive and negative aspects. On the one hand, it provided a degree of stability and order in rural areas. The zamindars were responsible for collecting taxes and maintaining law and order in their areas, and they often played a role in local development projects.

On the other hand, the zamindari system was also oppressive and exploitative. The zamindars often charged high rents from the peasants, and they had a great deal of power over their lives. In addition, the zamindari system was often inefficient, and it led to a great deal of corruption.

After India gained independence in 1947, the zamindari system was abolished. However, the legacy of the zamindari system continues to be debated today. Some people argue that the zamindari system was a necessary evil that helped to maintain order in rural areas. Others argue that the zamindari system was an oppressive and exploitative system that should have been abolished sooner.

The zamindari system is a complex issue with both positive and negative aspects. It is important to consider all of these aspects when evaluating the legacy of the zamindari system.