Who wrote a commentary on the Brahma sutras refuted Shari Kara and offered an interpretation based on the theistic ideas?

The correct answer is Ramanuja.

Ramanujacharya (1017–1137) was a Hindu philosopher and theologian who lived in Tamil Nadu, India. He is considered one of the most important figures in the Vedanta school of Hindu philosophy. Ramanuja’s philosophy is based on the Brahma Sutras, a collection of philosophical aphorisms that are one of the principal texts of Vedanta. Ramanuja’s commentary on the Brahma Sutras, the Sri Bhashya, is one of the most important works in Vedanta philosophy.

Ramanuja’s philosophy is a form of qualified non-dualism (vishishtadvaita). According to Ramanuja, Brahman, the ultimate reality, is both one and many. Brahman is the material and efficient cause of the world, and the world is a manifestation of Brahman. However, Brahman is also distinct from the world. The world is not an illusion, but it is not ultimately real either. It is a real manifestation of Brahman, but it is not Brahman itself.

Ramanuja’s philosophy is based on the idea of bhakti, or devotion to God. According to Ramanuja, bhakti is the highest form of religious practice. It is through bhakti that we can achieve moksha, or liberation from the cycle of rebirth.

Ramanuja’s philosophy has had a profound influence on Hindu thought. It is one of the most popular and influential schools of Vedanta philosophy. Ramanuja’s teachings have been adopted by many Hindu sects, and his philosophy continues to be studied and debated by Hindu scholars today.

The other options are incorrect because they do not represent the views of Ramanuja. Nimbarka, Madhva, and Vallabhacharya were all Hindu philosophers who lived in India during the same time period as Ramanuja. However, they all had different philosophical views than Ramanuja. Nimbarka was a proponent of advaita, or non-dualism, while Madhva was a proponent of dvaita, or dualism. Vallabhacharya was a proponent of shuddhdvaita, or pure non-dualism.

In conclusion, the correct answer to the question “Who wrote a commentary on the Brahma sutras refuted Shari Kara and offered an interpretation based on the theistic ideas?” is Ramanuja.