Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be a complete ban on genetically modified imported seeds? Arguments : I. Yes. This will boost the demand of domestically developed seeds. II. No. This is the only way to increase production substantially. III. Yes. Genetically modified products will adversely affect the health of those who consume these products.

The correct answer is: Only I and III are strong.

Argument I is strong because it is based on the principle of economic protectionism. The argument claims that banning genetically modified imported seeds will boost the demand for domestically developed seeds. This is a valid argument because it is based on the assumption that consumers will prefer domestically developed seeds to genetically modified imported seeds.

Argument II is weak because it is based on the assumption that genetically modified seeds are the only way to increase production substantially. This is an assumption that is not supported by evidence. There are other ways to increase production, such as using traditional breeding methods or using new agricultural technologies.

Argument III is strong because it is based on the principle of precaution. The argument claims that genetically modified products may adversely affect the health of those who consume them. This is a valid argument because it is based on the assumption that there is a risk that genetically modified products may be harmful.

Therefore, only arguments I and III are strong.