The correct answer is: Only I and III are strong.
Argument I is strong because it is based on the principle of equality of opportunity. All people, regardless of their caste, should have the opportunity to pursue higher education and achieve their full potential. Argument II is weak because it is based on the assumption that caste-based reservation is the only way to achieve a classless society. There are other ways to achieve this goal, such as providing free education and employment opportunities to all people. Argument III is strong because it is based on the principle of social justice. Caste-based reservation can help to reduce the inequality that exists between different castes.
Here is a more detailed explanation of each argument:
Argument I: Yes. The step is a must to bring the underprivileged at par with the privileged ones.
This argument is strong because it is based on the principle of equality of opportunity. All people, regardless of their caste, should have the opportunity to pursue higher education and achieve their full potential. Caste-based reservation can help to ensure that all people have an equal chance to succeed.
Argument II: No. It obstructs the establishment of a classless society.
This argument is weak because it is based on the assumption that caste-based reservation is the only way to achieve a classless society. There are other ways to achieve this goal, such as providing free education and employment opportunities to all people. Caste-based reservation is a band-aid solution that does not address the root causes of inequality.
Argument III: Yes. This will help the backward castes and classes of people to come out of the oppression of upper caste people.
This argument is strong because it is based on the principle of social justice. Caste-based reservation can help to reduce the inequality that exists between different castes. It can also help to empower the oppressed and give them a voice in society.