The correct answer is: Only argument I is strong.
Argument I is strong because it is based on a valid reason. Unscheduled holidays can disrupt the economy and cause inconvenience to people. Argument II is weak because it is based on an emotional appeal. People may want to pay their respects to the departed soul, but this does not mean that a public holiday is necessary.
Here is a more detailed explanation of each argument:
Argument I: No. Such unscheduled holidays hamper national progress.
This argument is strong because it is based on a valid reason. Unscheduled holidays can disrupt the economy and cause inconvenience to people. For example, if a public holiday is declared on the day of a major sporting event, people may not be able to attend the event. This could have a negative impact on the economy, as people would not be spending money on tickets, food, and other expenses. Additionally, unscheduled holidays can cause inconvenience to people who have to work on those days. For example, if a public holiday is declared on the day of a major exam, students may not be able to study for the exam. This could have a negative impact on their grades.
Argument II: Yes. People would like to pay their homage to the departed soul.
This argument is weak because it is based on an emotional appeal. People may want to pay their respects to the departed soul, but this does not mean that a public holiday is necessary. There are other ways to pay respects, such as attending a memorial service or visiting the gravesite. Additionally, not everyone agrees with the idea of public holidays for the demise of important national leaders. Some people believe that these holidays are a waste of time and money.
In conclusion, only argument I is strong. Argument II is weak because it is based on an emotional appeal.