Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should cutting of trees be banned altogether? Arguments : I. Yes. It is very much necessary to do so to restore ecological balance. II. No. A total ban would harm timber based industries.

The correct answer is: A. Only argument I is strong

Argument I is strong because it is based on the fact that cutting trees disrupts the ecological balance. Trees play a vital role in the environment, and their removal can have a number of negative consequences, such as soil erosion, climate change, and the loss of biodiversity.

Argument II is weak because it is based on the economic interests of timber-based industries. While it is true that a total ban on tree cutting would harm these industries, this is not a valid reason to continue cutting down trees. The economic interests of a few industries should not be put ahead of the health of the environment.

In conclusion, only argument I is strong.