Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should higher education be completely stopped for some time? Arguments : I. No. It will hamper the country’s future progress. II. Yes. It will reduce the educated unemployment.

The correct answer is: Only argument I is strong.

Argument I is strong because it is based on the premise that higher education is essential for the country’s future progress. This premise is supported by evidence from many countries, which have shown that higher education leads to economic growth and development. Argument II is weak because it is based on the premise that higher education leads to educated unemployment. This premise is not supported by evidence, as many studies have shown that higher education actually reduces unemployment.

Here is a more detailed explanation of each option:

• Option A: Only argument I is strong. This is the correct answer, as explained above.
• Option B: Only argument II is strong. This option is incorrect because argument II is weak.
• Option C: Either I or II is strong. This option is incorrect because only argument I is strong.
• Option D: Neither I nor II is strong. This option is incorrect because argument I is strong.
• Option E: Both I and II are strong. This option is incorrect because only argument I is strong.