The correct answer is: D. Neither I nor II is strong
Argument I is not strong because it is based on the assumption that all religions develop fanaticism in people. This is not necessarily true. There are many religions that promote peace and tolerance.
Argument II is not strong because it is based on the assumption that religion is the only thing that binds people together. This is also not necessarily true. There are many other things that can bind people together, such as shared interests, common values, and a sense of community.
In conclusion, neither argument I nor II is strong enough to support the conclusion that religion should be banned.