The correct answer is: C. Either I or II is strong
Argument I is a strong argument because it is based on the premise that nothing can be achieved without proper planning. This is a well-established principle in many fields, including business, government, and education. Without proper planning, it is difficult to set goals, develop strategies, and allocate resources effectively. As a result, it is likely that India will not achieve its development goals without proper planning.
Argument II is a weak argument because it is based on the premise that too much time, money, and energy is wasted on planning. This is a common complaint, but it is not always accurate. In some cases, planning can be a very efficient way to use resources. For example, if a company takes the time to carefully plan a new product launch, it is likely to save money and time in the long run.
In the case of India’s development plans, it is difficult to say whether or not too much time, money, and energy is being wasted. It is possible that the plans are not being implemented effectively, or that they are not being tailored to the specific needs of India. However, it is also possible that the plans are essential for India’s development, and that the time, money, and energy being spent on them is justified.
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not India needs so many plans for development is a complex one. There is no easy answer, and it is likely that different people will have different opinions. However, the arguments presented in the question are both valid, and they should be considered carefully before making a decision.