The guard was given explicit orders about whom to admit.

The correct answer is: A. wrong

The guard was given explicit orders about whom to admit. This means that the guard was given very clear and specific instructions about who was allowed to enter the premises. The guard was not given inadequate orders, no orders, or ambiguous orders.

• Inadequate orders would be orders that were not clear or specific enough. For example, if the guard was told to “admit only authorized personnel,” this would be an inadequate order because it does not specify who is authorized personnel.
• No orders would mean that the guard was not given any instructions about whom to admit. This would be a very dangerous situation, as the guard would not know who was allowed to enter the premises and who was not.
• Ambiguous orders would be orders that were open to interpretation. For example, if the guard was told to “admit only those who look like they belong,” this would be an ambiguous order because it does not specify what it means to “look like they belong.”

In conclusion, the correct answer is: A. wrong. The guard was given explicit orders about whom to admit. This means that the guard was given very clear and specific instructions about who was allowed to enter the premises. The guard was not given inadequate orders, no orders, or ambiguous orders.