The technique of management audit in which functions and achievements of two or more firms are compared, is called

Comparative analysis
Inter-firm comparison
Routine check
Ratio analysis

The correct answer is: A. Comparative analysis.

Comparative analysis is a technique of management audit in which functions and achievements of two or more firms are compared. It is a useful tool for identifying areas where a firm can improve its performance.

B. Inter-firm comparison is a type of comparative analysis that compares the performance of two or more firms in the same industry. This can be a useful tool for identifying best practices and benchmarking performance.

C. Routine check is a type of audit that is conducted on a regular basis to ensure that a firm is in compliance with regulations and procedures. This type of audit is not typically used for comparative analysis.

D. Ratio analysis is a technique that uses financial ratios to compare the performance of a firm over time or to compare the performance of two or more firms. This type of analysis is not typically used for comparative analysis.