The correct answer is (d).
The Constitution of India does not require that a Bill for enacting a law to form a new State be referred to the legislature of the State, whose area, boundaries or name is affected.
Article 3 of the Constitution provides that Parliament may by law form a new State by separation of territory from any State or by uniting two or more States or parts of States or by uniting any territory to any State.
Sub-clause (b) of Article 3 provides that such law shall contain provisions for the amendment of the First Schedule and the Fourth Schedule.
The First Schedule lists the States and Union Territories of India. The Fourth Schedule lists the seats allotted to each State in the Council of States.
Sub-clause (c) of Article 3 provides that such law shall be deemed to be an amendment of the Constitution for the purpose of Article 368.
Article 368 provides that Parliament may by law amend the Constitution in any manner.
Sub-clause (d) of Article 3 provides that no Bill for the purpose of forming a new State shall be introduced in the Parliament unless it has been referred to the Legislatures of the States affected.
However, this requirement is not applicable to a Bill for the purpose of forming a new State by separation of territory from any State.
This is because the territory of the State from which the new State is to be formed will not be affected by the formation of the new State.
The formation of a new State by separation of territory from any State does not affect the area, boundaries or name of the State from which the new State is to be formed.
Therefore, the legislature of the State from which the new State is to be formed does not need to be consulted before a Bill for the purpose of forming a new State is introduced in the Parliament.