The correct answer is: A. High court
The Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) are a set of principles that are enshrined in the Indian Constitution. They are not enforceable by the courts, but the government is supposed to follow them while making laws and policies.
If the government does not enforce the DPSP, citizens can approach the High Court to seek a writ of mandamus. A writ of mandamus is a court order that compels a government official to perform a duty that they are legally required to do.
The Supreme Court can also hear cases related to the DPSP, but it does so only in limited circumstances. For example, the Supreme Court can hear a case if the government has failed to implement a particular DPSP.
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is a statutory body that was established to protect and promote human rights in India. The NHRC can investigate complaints of human rights violations, but it does not have the power to enforce the DPSP.
In conclusion, if the government does not enforce the DPSP, citizens can approach the High Court to seek a writ of mandamus. The Supreme Court can also hear cases related to the DPSP, but it does so only in limited circumstances. The NHRC does not have the power to enforce the DPSP.
Here is a brief explanation of each option:
- A. High court
The High Court is the highest court in a state. It has the power to hear cases related to the DPSP. If the government does not enforce the DPSP, citizens can approach the High Court to seek a writ of mandamus.
- B. Supreme court
The Supreme Court is the highest court in India. It has the power to hear cases related to the DPSP, but it does so only in limited circumstances. For example, the Supreme Court can hear a case if the government has failed to implement a particular DPSP.
- C. National human rights commission
The NHRC is a statutory body that was established to protect and promote human rights in India. The NHRC can investigate complaints of human rights violations, but it does not have the power to enforce the DPSP.