Pricing of public utilities and government policy
Priority to public
There are a number of principles which govern the pricing of public utility Services. There are public utilities like Education, sewage, roads, etc. which may be supplied free to the public and their costs should be covered through general Taxation. Dalton calls it the general taxation principle. Such services are pure public goods whose benefits cannot be priced because they are indivisible.
It is not possible to identify the individual beneficiaries and charge them for the services. In some cases, the beneficiaries may be identified but they cannot be charged for their use. For instance, the users of a bridge (flyover) over the railway line can be identified, but it may be inconvenient to the taxing authority to collect the road tax and for the road users to pay the tax due for the time involved.
The best course is to finance the flyover out of general taxation. J.F. Due has mentioned the following four rules where public services should be provided free and their costs covered from general taxation.
Firstly, in the case of such services where little waste will occur if they are provided free. Second, where charging a price will restrict the use of the service. Third, where the cost of collecting taxes is high. Fourth, where the pattern of distribution of tax burden on services is inequitable.
These rules are applicable to a few essential public services like education, sewage, roads, etc. But in the case of services other than those included under “pure public goods,” free services might lead to wastage of Resources.
The general principle for pricing such public services is to recover costs without distorting the allocation of resources. This is done by making selling price equal to short-run marginal costs while keeping productive capacity constant. But water and power systems periodically require large investments. In such cases, Average costs fall as production is increased and the actual price charged is below the average cost.
Marginal Cost Pricing Rule
One of the aims of PSEs is to be economically efficient or to maximise social welfare. If a PSE has a monopoly in the production of a good or service, it will not be economically efficient because it produces where MC=MR. However, for more efficient resource allocation, it is essential to find out whether the PSE is operating under decreasing or increasing returns.
If price equals MC under decreasing returns, the PSE will earn profits and if it is operating under increasing returns, the PSE will incur losses. Thus the application of the marginal cost pricing rule to PSEs has implications for the financial position of the enterprise.
No-Profit No-Loss Policy
Economists like Lewis, Coase, Durbin, Henderson, and little advocate no-profit no-loss policy or the principle of break-even for PSEs. Their contention is that PSEs are meant to serve public interest and not to make profits.
According to Lewis, the price policy of PSEs should be such that they should make neither a loss nor a profit after meeting all capital charges. He further states that what the economists principle supports is not the MC pricing but a system of charging what the traffic will bear’ so that consumers contribute to fixed costs according to their capacity to pay.
Lewis supports this policy on the ground that it prevents over-expansion and under-expansion of PSEs and avoids inflationary and deflationary tendencies. Other economists opine that PSEs should pay their way taking one year with another. They should fix such a price for their products or services so as to break-even over a period of years, making neither losses nor profits.
The no-profit no-loss policy means that the prices of PSE products or services should cover total costs. Total costs include all types of expenses incurred by a PSE in producing a product. They are short-period and long-period fixed and variable costs of production, current and replacement costs, depreciation charges, interest on capital employed, and advertisement, selling and distribution expenses.
Profit-Price Policy
In developing countries like India where PSEs are required to play a dominant role in Economic Development, PSEs follow the profit-price policy. The profit-price policy was first put forward in India by Dr. V.K.R.V. Rao in June, 1959. In a Note to the AICC Seminar on Planning held at Ooty, he categorically rejected the theory of no-profit no-loss for PSEs and argued for the adoption of profit-price policy.
Such a policy would make the state utilise its own resources rather than taxing its citizens. According to him, PSEs must be carried on a profit making basis not only in the sense that the public enterprises must yield an economic price but also get for the community sufficient resources for financing a part of Investment and maintenance expenditure of the government. This involves a profit-price policy in regard to PSEs.
The theory of no-profit no-loss in PSEs is particularly inconsistent with a socialist economy and if followed in a Mixed Economy like India, it will hamper its development. In support of his view, Prof. Rao quoted the example of the erstwhile USSR. In the USSR, PSEs made a double contribution to development finance: reinvestment of profits for their own expansion and contribution to the state budget.
,
Pricing of Public Utilities
Public utilities are essential services that are provided to the public by private companies. These services include water, electricity, gas, and telecommunications. Public utilities are regulated by the government to ensure that they are providing these services at a fair price.
There are four main types of pricing for public utilities: cost-based pricing, marginal cost pricing, peak-load pricing, and Ramsey pricing.
Cost-based pricing is the most common type of pricing for public utilities. Under cost-based pricing, the utility company charges a price that covers its costs of providing the service, plus a profit margin. This type of pricing is fair to both the utility company and the consumers, as it ensures that the utility company is able to recover its costs and make a profit, while also ensuring that consumers are not overcharged.
Marginal cost pricing is a type of pricing that charges consumers only the cost of providing the additional unit of service. This type of pricing is often used for public utilities that have a lot of unused capacity, such as electricity and gas utilities. Under marginal cost pricing, the utility company would charge a lower price during off-peak hours, when demand is low, and a higher price during peak hours, when demand is high.
Peak-load pricing is a type of pricing that charges consumers more during peak hours than during off-peak hours. This type of pricing is often used for public utilities that have a limited capacity, such as electricity and gas utilities. Under peak-load pricing, the utility company would charge a higher price during peak hours, when demand is high, and a lower price during off-peak hours, when demand is low.
Ramsey pricing is a type of pricing that charges consumers different prices for the same service, based on their ability to pay. This type of pricing is often used for public utilities that are considered essential services, such as water and electricity. Under Ramsey pricing, the utility company would charge a higher price to consumers who are able to pay more, and a lower price to consumers who are not able to pay as much.
Government Policy
The government plays a significant role in the pricing of public utilities. The government regulates public utilities to ensure that they are providing these services at a fair price. The government also sets standards for the quality of these services.
The government has a number of policy Options available to it to influence the pricing of public utilities. These options include regulation, deregulation, Privatization, competition, Consumer protection, environmental protection, and social welfare.
Regulation is the most common policy tool used by the government to influence the pricing of public utilities. Under regulation, the government sets prices for public utilities or limits the prices that they can charge. Regulation is often used to protect consumers from being overcharged by public utilities.
Deregulation is the opposite of regulation. Under deregulation, the government removes or reduces the regulations that it has imposed on public utilities. Deregulation is often used to promote competition in the public utility Industry.
Privatization is the process of transferring ownership of a public utility from the government to the private sector. Privatization is often used to promote efficiency and competition in the public utility industry.
Competition is the rivalry between businesses to sell goods and services to consumers. Competition can help to lower prices and improve the quality of goods and services. The government can promote competition in the public utility industry by deregulation, privatization, and other means.
Consumer protection is the government’s efforts to protect consumers from unfair or deceptive business practices. The government can protect consumers from being overcharged by public utilities by regulation, deregulation, and other means.
Environmental protection is the government’s efforts to protect the Environment from pollution. The government can protect the environment from pollution by regulation, deregulation, and other means.
Social welfare is the government’s efforts to promote the well-being of its citizens. The government can promote social welfare by regulation, deregulation, and other means.
The government has a number of policy options available to it to influence the pricing of public utilities. The government must choose the policy options that are most appropriate for the particular public utility and the particular circumstances.
What are public utilities?
Public utilities are essential services that are provided to the public, such as water, electricity, gas, and telecommunications. They are often regulated by the government to ensure that they are affordable and accessible to all.
How are public utilities priced?
The pricing of public utilities is complex and varies depending on the type of utility and the jurisdiction. In general, public utilities are priced to cover their costs, including the Cost of Capital, operations, and maintenance. They may also be subject to government regulation, which can impact their prices.
What are the benefits of public utilities?
Public utilities provide essential services that are vital to the economy and Society. They help to ensure that everyone has access to basic necessities, such as water, electricity, and gas. They also play a role in promoting economic development and job creation.
What are the challenges of public utilities?
Public utilities can face a number of challenges, including rising costs, aging Infrastructure-2/”>INFRASTRUCTURE, and competition from private companies. They may also be subject to political interference, which can make it difficult to manage them effectively.
What is the role of government in pricing public utilities?
The government plays a role in pricing public utilities in a number of ways. In some cases, the government may set the prices that public utilities charge. In other cases, the government may regulate the prices that public utilities charge. The government may also provide subsidies to public utilities to help them keep their prices low.
What are the pros and cons of government regulation of public utilities?
Government regulation of public utilities can have both pros and cons. On the one hand, regulation can help to ensure that public utilities are affordable and accessible to all. On the other hand, regulation can also lead to higher prices and less innovation.
What are the future trends in the pricing of public utilities?
The future trends in the pricing of public utilities are uncertain. However, it is likely that prices will continue to rise due to factors such as Inflation and rising costs of energy. It is also possible that public utilities will face increased competition from private companies, which could lead to lower prices.
-
Which of the following is not a public utility?
(A) Electricity
(B) Water
(C) Gas
(D) Education -
The price of a public utility is determined by:
(A) The government
(B) The market
(C) The utility company
(D) Both the government and the market -
The government may regulate the price of a public utility in order to:
(A) Ensure that the utility is profitable
(B) Ensure that the utility provides service to all customers
(C) Ensure that the utility does not charge excessive prices
(D) All of the above -
The government may also regulate the quality of service provided by a public utility in order to:
(A) Ensure that the utility meets certain standards
(B) Protect customers from unsafe or unreliable service
(C) Ensure that the utility does not discriminate against certain customers
(D) All of the above -
Public utilities are often considered to be natural monopolies. This means that:
(A) There is only one company that can provide the service
(B) The cost of providing the service is very high
(C) The service is essential to the public
(D) All of the above -
One of the challenges of regulating public utilities is that:
(A) It is difficult to determine the appropriate price for the service
(B) It is difficult to ensure that the utility provides quality service
(C) It is difficult to prevent the utility from engaging in anti-competitive behavior
(D) All of the above -
Another challenge of regulating public utilities is that:
(A) The government may not have the resources to effectively regulate the utility
(B) The government may be subject to political pressure from the utility company
(C) The government may be subject to political pressure from customers
(D) All of the above -
Despite the challenges, there are several reasons why the government may choose to regulate public utilities. These reasons include:
(A) To ensure that the utility is profitable
(B) To ensure that the utility provides service to all customers
(C) To ensure that the utility does not charge excessive prices
(D) To protect customers from unsafe or unreliable service
(E) To prevent the utility from engaging in anti-competitive behavior -
One of the benefits of regulating public utilities is that it can help to ensure that the utility provides quality service to all customers. This is because the government can set standards for the quality of service and can enforce those standards.
-
Another benefit of regulating public utilities is that it can help to prevent the utility from engaging in anti-competitive behavior. This is because the government can regulate the prices that the utility charges and can prevent the utility from engaging in predatory pricing.
-
However, there are also some drawbacks to regulating public utilities. One of the drawbacks is that it can be difficult for the government to determine the appropriate price for the service. This is because the cost of providing the service can vary depending on a number of factors, such as the cost of labor, the cost of materials, and the cost of capital.
-
Another drawback of regulating public utilities is that it can be difficult for the government to ensure that the utility provides quality service. This is because the government may not have the resources to effectively monitor the utility’s performance.
-
Despite the drawbacks, there are a number of reasons why the government may choose to regulate public utilities. These reasons include:
(A) To ensure that the utility is profitable
(B) To ensure that the utility provides service to all customers
(C) To ensure that the utility does not charge excessive prices
(D) To protect customers from unsafe or unreliable service
(E) To prevent the utility from engaging in anti-competitive behavior -
In conclusion, there are a number of challenges and benefits associated with regulating public utilities. The government must weigh these factors carefully when deciding whether or not to regulate a particular utility.