WTO: Reboot

  • WTO’s Diminished Relevance: Rising protectionism, paralyzed dispute settlement, proliferation of FTAs challenge WTO’s role.
  • Dispute Settlement Crisis: The Appellate Body is non-functional due to blocked appointments by the US since 2019, weakening enforcement.
  • Negotiation Stalemate: Doha Round failed due to disagreements on agriculture, market access, subsidies.
  • MFN Erosion: FTAs bypass MFN obligations, fragmenting trade rules, and undermining the multilateral vision.
  • Rise of Protectionism: Trade wars, unilateral tariffs using “national security” exceptions weaken WTO principles.
  • Inability to Address New Issues: WTO lacks rules for the digital economy, e-commerce, and climate-related trade.
  • Power Imbalance: Developed countries push reforms, while developing countries resist, fearing loss of development space.
  • Geopolitical Tensions: US-China rivalry, Russia-Ukraine war, and strategic blocs reduce cooperation within the WTO.
  • Developing Country Status Disputes: Disagreement over benefits for large economies like China.
  • India’s Concerns: MSP exceeding subsidy caps and reluctance to negotiate labor/environmental standards.
  • WTO’s Significance: Despite challenges, it facilitated trade growth, reduced poverty, and provided a platform for the Global South.
  • Revival Measures: Equitable globalization, enforceable digital trade rules, restoring dispute settlement, redefining SDT based on dynamic criteria, trade-climate linkages, and a permanent reform council.
  • Loss of Compass: WTO is not performing negotiating, dispute settlement, or trade monitoring functions, according to some experts.
  • US Distrust: The US believes it lowered tariffs too much compared to other countries and feels MFN has not worked.
  • China Challenge: WTO rules were inadequate to address China’s dominance and trade practices.