An Introduction of Jharkhand History

&<2/”>a >nbsp;

Jharkhand which came into being on 15 November 2000 as the 28th State of The Union is the homeland of the tribal‘s for which they had been dreaming for Centuries. According to legend. Raja Jai Singh Deo of Orissa had declared himself the ruler of Jharkhand in the 13th century. It largely comprises forest tracks of chhotanagpur plateau and Santhal Pargana and has distinct cultural Traditions. In post-Independence era. The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha started a Regular agitation which impelled the government to establish the Jharkhand Area Autonomous Council in 1995 and finally a full-fledged State According to prominent historians like SC Roy. The Mundas were spread all over the north of India in the 3rd Millennium BC. And they were constantly on the move. Their wanderings were sometimes due to natural causes, but often due to invasion by outsiders The Mundas fled to the hilly regions to

Preserve their independence and identity.

At one time, they inhabited what is presently Punjab. Later they came down to Utter Pradesh, then to Bihar and finally they settled in chotanagpur or Jharkhand. The Oraons . Representing the Dravidian tribes, were originally in the Konkan region of what is presently Karnataka. Later they moved towards

Maharastra. Bihar and finally to Chotanagpur a few centuries after the Munda.

The Santhal tribe had lived prosperously for some centuries in the Champ region (now in Chattisgarh). Later they moved towards Bhagalpur. and finally to Saont in Midnapur, from which they derived the name Santhal Adivasis inhabited the Gangetic plains during the pre- Vedic period and were an agrarian Society. When the pastoral Aryans invaded the Gangetic plains they succeeded in conquering the fertile area since they had horses which enabled them to be more mobile.

One of the main characteristics of the Adivasis in the course of their history of struggle with alien cultures was the fact that they were always away from the centre of power, they were frequently on the fringes. In the era of small kingdoms developing into empires such as the Magadha empire and the Ashoka Mauria during the 800 BC. And the Guptas and Cholas around 10th and 12th AD,

evidence of the marginal existence of the Adivasis community is to be found. In all the records we find references to Adivasis people as dasyu, danavs, rakshasha and savage, etc.

The Aryan people were more dominant and aggressive. They had a monarchical system of governance based on the vama system and a standing army with fighting skills. Egalitarian Adivasis communities did not have a kingship system, since it was based on hierarchy — a concept alien to the tribal ethos. Instead of Kingship the Adivasis had clan groups among the Kill system the clan system. This later developed into the Khutkati system Nor did they have a standing army, since the self-sufficient Adivasis communities did not have a division of labour based on workers and non-workers.

Marginalisetion of the Adivasis continued during the medieval period. During this period, the Muslims came to India, as early as 711 AD. As a part of, an expedition led by the Arab General Muhammad bin Qasim Shortly thereafter, Sindh, part of lower Punjab, was incorporated into the Arab Umayyad Caliphate In the course of time, the Muslims conquered a number of Hindu kings. However, the Muslim Emperors were not interested in invading the Adivasis areas, except for collecting malgujari – tax. Even during this period. The Adivasis continued their traditional system of socio-cultural and political governance .

The Parha and the Manki Mundua system was the basis of the social union among the Adivasis in Jharkhand. Kingship developed amongst the Adivasis as a result of the necessity to protect their natural and livelihood Resources from alien predations and to pay taxes to more powerful emperors. The kings would appoint someone from

amongst their kin to be an agent to collect tax. The revenue thus collected was then used for paying the taxes to the emperor. The Nagbashi Rajas, the Jaria garh Raja, the Ratu Raja, etc., were amongst some of these small kings. They would collect malgujari from the people to pay to the Emperors. This system of kings can be seen in the Oraon areas, in the western region of Jharkhand.

This kingship system was resisted by the Adivasis. The Hos resisted the malgujari. and so too did the Santhals and the Mundas. This resistance

 

became more prominent during the British rule in India which resulted in the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, the Santhal Parganas Tenancy Act, and the Wilkinson Rule. These rules and Acts recognised the distinctiveness of the social-cultural and political institutions of the Adivasi people. They also provided the British government with a better way of collecting tax from a people who refused to part with the lands that had been cleared and cultivated for several generations. It is clear that the customary system of self-governance of the Adivasis has existed and evolved in the course of the history as far back as we can trace it Their customary practices have been one of the main strengths of the Adivasis people. This is how they have been able, in the past, to resist outside forces encroaching into their freedom.

The economic effects of forcible incorporation of Adivasis into a stratified market economy have been well recorded. However, as well as the economic exploitation and land alienation, the incorporation and subordination of the Adivasi society in to the market economy, has led to the destruction of the community as a whole. This disempowerment was done through a very conscious destruction of the Adivasi institutions of governance.

In the case of Jharkhand, with the establishment of British rule we find a conscious effort to destroy the traditional Adivasis institution of self- governance, self-regulation, such as Munda Manki system and the Parha system. These representative institutions were supplanted by a new set of institutions to enable the British not only to appropriate the economic and labour resources of the Adivasis communities in the form of land revenue and indentured labour, but also to make these new institutions independent of the control of the Adivasis community.

It is no accident that unlike the Munda Manki system. which was communitarian and not necessarily hereditary, the new system was always based in an individual authority and in several cases hereditary. These offices of revenue extraction were vested with authorities of a feudatory chief or raja.

A part from the system of revenue and labour extractions a new and bureaucratic civil and criminal administration was also set up.

Bureaucracy, police and courts were encountered by the Adivasi communities for the first time. These institutions not only destroyed the Adivasi communities, since they were completely out of the control of the  society, they also eroded the communitarian principles that permeated the self- regulatory mechanism of the Adivasi society. The impact of this ethos was evident in mechanism of dispute settlement in the traditional Adivasi institutions.

In the case of disputes, such as inter-clan clashes, murders or debts.the emphasis of the community panchayat was on Justice, ratherer then judgment or punishment. All this changed with the advent of the modern bureaucracy that was based on individualism and impersonality. The Adivasis notion of justice was replaced by the modern binary of crime and punishment. The inability of the Adivasi people to grasp this subtle but deadly shift often led to tragic consequences. In the initial year of the establishment of police stations there are several recorded instances of the Adivasi warrior‘s reporting to the police station with the body of their victims.

What has been patronizingly recorded by the police officials as the “innocence and simplicity of the savage tribal‘s” was in fact the result of the failure of the Adivasi communities to understand the full import of the modem judicial principle crime and punishment. Rather than endeavoring to resolve the cause of acrimony between the Adivasi individuals or groups so that harmony could once again be restored, as was the traditional custom of the Adivasi panchayat the modern institutions resorted to punitive action, since for them an individual was solely responsible for its acts of omission and commission.

The Adivasi mechanism of grievance redress was therefore trespassed and violated. Furthermore, in its dealings with modern bureaucracy, judiciary and police the Adivasi notion of self-respect was violated. The elitist Attitude of the colonial and Indian mindset was largely responsible for this. It either treated the Adivasi as a barbarian or as a simple or genial savage who was incapable of taking care of himself.

Apart from the attitude of the officials, the mystifying processes and functions of these new institutions made it impossible for the Adivasis to engage with these institutions on an equal footing. Official work during the colonial period was done entirely in English and in the post independence era in Hindi. Given the preponderance of these non Adivasis languages, the Adivasis were either compelled to learn the language of their conquerors and the attached cultural baggage or  depend on the non-Adivasis in their efforts to seek justice from the modern institutions.

Either way, the Adivasis lost their autonomy, self sufficiency and self respect. It is not an accident therefore that in every Adivasi institution; of police, judiciary and bureaucracy were made targets of attack. It is noting here the curious case of the shooting of an arrow by Birsa Munda on a seminary in Sarvada to mark the beginning of his protest. This act has been interpreted by certain communal minded people as an attack on the religious beliefs of the inmates of the seminary however, if the intention of Birsa was to destroy the seminary rather than shooting a single arrow from a great distance he would have organised a full fledged raid on the institution.

However, what a western anglophile failed to recognise is that the problem of Adivasis is not only the inability to successfully represent their case in the modern institutions, but the very act of incorporation of the Adivasi society within the modern institutions. The arrow shot on the pastor by Birsa was not aimed at his religious belief, but was intended to draw a line of demarcation between the Adivasis desire to retain their traditional autonomy and the desire of an anglophile to facilitate an easy and civilized way of coopting the tribal community into the modern system.

Oral tradition as a basis of customary practices The Adivasi customary practices evolve from the praxis of oral traditional. In other words, the culture defines the customary practices. It is reflected in what people give value to and what they value. The event is important rather than the time in which it took place. It is not important that it is published but that it is remembered and recounted through the generations. The past is not a catalogue of facts but an encoding of events as the marker of Adivasi valor, justice, dignity, etc. Oral traditions are expressions of communality and community unlike the written script which becomes individual and personal.

The manner in which the Adivasi oral traditions were weakened was through the imposition of the written script by the ruling class. So today any and everything has to be written down in order to have validity. Whatever is unwritten and oral has been put in the category of myths and superstition. Once the commonality of the material resources gets privatised there will be an adverse impact on social relationships among the members of the society and a very negative influence on the cultural values and attitudes of the people. This is precisely what the British did by introducing the individual patta system.

This is exactly what happened to the Adivasi in India and in Jharkhand. As a result Communalism is replaced by individualism. Common property becomes private property. Co-operation becomes competition. Consensus in DECISION MAKING becomes majority decision. Equality among the members of the community becomes inequality. When India became independent the local ruling class, which was largely non Adivasi and which hailed from north Bihar, and whose language was Hindi, systematically imposed Hindi on the Adivasi people of Jharkhand.

Thus Hindi was made a necessary language both at the level of administration as well as in the formal Education system. As a consequence, the children who started to go primary school had to learn Hindi. The Adivasi school-going children did not fare well in Hindi because: they did not speak it home, where as non-adivasi children, whose mother tongue was Hindi, much better at school .

Hindi was also propagated to lessen the importance given to English. In this effort however the independence government largely failed because English continued to hold its sway in college and university education. The net consequence of this language policy was that Adivasi languages suffered from a double assault from government patronized Hindi and elite patronized English. National development leading to underdevelopment of the Indigenous people India has one of the largest indigenous populations in the world Adivasis in India form nearly 8 percent of India’s total Population In the slate of Jharkhand. as SC Bhatt in the District Gazetteer of Jharkhand puts it. “during fifty years since independence, the Jharkhand land and the Jharkhandi people have been in a process of being reduced to shameles in several respects. The region consists of 79.714 sq kms of land with 2.69.09.428 population of whom 30 percent are indigenous Adivasis. Where as they were 60 percent at the sun of the last century.

Due to displacement process the indigenous people of Jharkhand are perhaps the worst hit. otherwise this region is the richest region in the whole country in terms of Natural Resources, viz timber and several  kinds of Minerals drawn from far flung areas.” The planners of India’s 5 year plans adopted a policy of “positive discrimination” towards Adivasis by providing them with certain extra facilities.

In the beginning of the 1990s. the Adivasi members of Parliament brought the attention of the government both inside and outside parliament to the continued deprivation of their people. In 1992 the central government appointed a special commission under the Leadership of Shri Delip Singh Bhuriua to make specific recommendations towards self-rule and self-development the Adivasi people.

The Aryan people were more dominant and aggressive. They had a monarchical system of governance based on the vama system and a standing army with fighting skills. Egalitarian Adivasi communities did not have a kingship system, since it was based on hierarchy — a concept alien to the tribal ethos. Instead of Kingship the Adivasis had clan groups among the Kily system — the clan system. This later developed into the Khutkati system. Nor did they have a standing army, since the self-sufficient Adivasis communities did not have a division of labour based on workers and non-workers.

history image,

Jharkhand is a state in eastern India. It was formed on 15 November 2000, by carving out 18 districts from the southern part of Bihar. The state is named after the Jharkhandi people, who are the indigenous inhabitants of the region.

The early history of Jharkhand is not well-documented. However, it is believed that the region was inhabited by the Munda people since at least the 2nd century BC. The Munda people are a tribal group who are native to Jharkhand. They are believed to be the earliest inhabitants of the region.

In the 16th century, the Mughal Empire conquered Jharkhand. The Mughals ruled the region for over 200 years. During this time, the region was known as Jharkhand. The Mughals introduced a number of changes to the region, including the introduction of Islam and the construction of a number of forts and mosques.

In the 18th century, the British East India Company conquered Jharkhand. The British ruled the region for over 200 years. During this time, the region was known as Chota Nagpur. The British introduced a number of changes to the region, including the introduction of Christianity and the construction of a number of railways and roads.

In the early 20th century, the Jharkhand movement began. The Jharkhand movement was a movement for the creation of a separate state for the Jharkhandi people. The movement was successful, and Jharkhand was formed as a separate state in 2000.

Post-independence Jharkhand has seen a number of changes. The state has experienced rapid economic Growth, and the standard of living has improved. However, the state has also faced a number of challenges, including POVERTY, illiteracy, and Corruption.

Despite the challenges, Jharkhand is a beautiful and diverse state with a rich history and culture. The people of Jharkhand are proud of their heritage, and they are working hard to build a better future for their state.

Early history

The early history of Jharkhand is not well-documented. However, it is believed that the region was inhabited by the Munda people since at least the 2nd century BC. The Munda people are a tribal group who are native to Jharkhand. They are believed to be the earliest inhabitants of the region.

The Munda people were a hunter-gatherer society. They lived in small villages and practiced a simple form of agriculture. The Munda people were also skilled in metalworking and Pottery.

In the 16th century, the Mughal Empire conquered Jharkhand. The Mughals ruled the region for over 200 years. During this time, the region was known as Jharkhand. The Mughals introduced a number of changes to the region, including the introduction of Islam and the construction of a number of forts and mosques.

The Mughals also introduced a number of taxes on the Munda people. These taxes were very heavy, and they caused a great deal of hardship for the Munda people.

In the 18th century, the British East India Company conquered Jharkhand. The British ruled the region for over 200 years. During this time, the region was known as Chota Nagpur. The British introduced a number of changes to the region, including the introduction of Christianity and the construction of a number of railways and roads.

The British also introduced a number of laws that discriminated against the Munda people. These laws made it difficult for the Munda people to own land or to get an education.

The Jharkhand movement

In the early 20th century, the Jharkhand movement began. The Jharkhand movement was a movement for the creation of a separate state for the Jharkhandi people. The movement was successful, and Jharkhand was formed as a separate state in 2000.

The Jharkhand movement was led by a number of prominent leaders, including Jaipal Singh Munda and Shibu Soren. These leaders argued that the Jharkhandi people were being discriminated against by the government of Bihar. They also argued that the Jharkhandi people had a unique culture and history that deserved to be preserved.

The Jharkhand movement was successful in achieving its goal of creating a separate state for the Jharkhandi people. However, the movement has also faced a number of challenges since the formation of Jharkhand. These challenges include poverty, illiteracy, and corruption.

Post-independence Jharkhand

Post-independence Jharkhand has seen a number of changes. The state has experienced rapid economic growth, and the standard of living has improved. However, the state has also faced a number of challenges, including poverty, illiteracy, and corruption.

Despite the challenges, Jharkhand is a beautiful and diverse state with a rich history and culture. The people of Jharkhand are proud of their heritage, and they are working hard to build a better future for their state.

What is Jharkhand?

Jharkhand is a state in eastern India. It was formed on 15 November 2000 by carving out 18 districts from the southern part of Bihar. The state is named after the Jharkhandi people, who are the indigenous inhabitants of the region.

What is the history of Jharkhand?

The history of Jharkhand can be traced back to the Indus Valley Civilization. The region was later ruled by the Mauryan Empire, The Gupta Empire, the Pala Empire, and the Sena Empire. In the 16th century, the Mughal Empire conquered Jharkhand. The region was later ruled by the Nawabs of Bengal and the British East India Company.

What are the major languages spoken in Jharkhand?

The major languages spoken in Jharkhand are Hindi, Bengali, Santhali, Mundari, and Oraon.

What are the major religions practiced in Jharkhand?

The major religions practiced in Jharkhand are Hinduism-2/”>Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, and Sarnaism.

What are the major industries in Jharkhand?

The major industries in Jharkhand are mining, steel, power, and cement.

What are the major tourist attractions in Jharkhand?

The major tourist attractions in Jharkhand are the Dalma Wildlife Sanctuary, the Betla National Park, the Hazaribagh National Park, the Ranchi Rock Garden, and the Jagannath Temple.

What are the major challenges facing Jharkhand?

The major challenges facing Jharkhand are poverty, illiteracy, Unemployment, and corruption.

What is the future of Jharkhand?

The future of Jharkhand is bright. The state has a lot of potential for development. With the right policies and investments, Jharkhand can become a prosperous state.

Here are some MCQs about Jharkhand history:

  1. Which of the following is not a state in India?
    (A) Jharkhand
    (B) Chhattisgarh
    (C) Madhya Pradesh
    (D) Uttar Pradesh

  2. Jharkhand was formed in which year?
    (A) 2000
    (B) 2001
    (C) 2002
    (D) 2003

  3. The capital of Jharkhand is:
    (A) Ranchi
    (B) Jamshedpur
    (C) Bokaro
    (D) Dhanbad

  4. The majority language spoken in Jharkhand is:
    (A) Hindi
    (B) Bengali
    (C) Odia
    (D) Mundari

  5. The main religion practiced in Jharkhand is:
    (A) Hinduism
    (B) Islam
    (C) Christianity
    (D) Sikhism

  6. The main occupation of the people of Jharkhand is:
    (A) Agriculture
    (B) Mining
    (C) Industry
    (D) Service

  7. The main tourist attractions in Jharkhand are:
    (A) The Dalma Wildlife Sanctuary
    (B) The Betla National Park
    (C) The Hazaribagh National Park
    (D) All of the above

  8. The famous freedom fighter Birsa Munda was born in which district of Jharkhand?
    (A) Ranchi
    (B) Gumla
    (C) Lohardaga
    (D) Simdega

  9. The famous tribal dance of Jharkhand is:
    (A) Jhumar
    (B) Chhau/”>Chhau
    (C) Karma
    (D) Raut Nacha

  10. The famous tribal festival of Jharkhand is:
    (A) Sarhul
    (B) Karma
    (C) Sohrai
    (D) Maghe Parab

Answers:
1. (D)
2. (A)
3. (A)
4. (D)
5. (A)
6. (A)
7. (D)
8. (B)
9. (A)
10. (A)

Exit mobile version